Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through
links on Gadgetspotr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and
servers) on.
Learn more
104
Highlights
39
Differences
6
Reactions
0
Likes
Anker 737 Prime
vs
Anker Prime 67W:
104 Highlights & 39 Differences —
So, Which Charger Actually Works Better
Learn which Anker charger fits your budget and charging style best.
Choosing the better charger? This comparison shows Anker 737 Prime vs Anker Prime 67W side by side — from usb-c ports, cable length, weight & travel size classification to what users love.
Plug Insertion Cycles: High
Indicates how many plug-in and unplug cycles the charger connector is designed to withstand before wear affects performance.
with 2 points higher
Plug Insertion Cycles: High
Indicates how many plug-in and unplug cycles the charger connector is designed to withstand before wear affects performance.
with 2 points higher
Anker 737 Prime vs Anker Prime 67W: Power vs Portability in a Modern GaN Charger
The Anker 737 Prime and the Anker Prime 67W are both GaN-based wall chargers built for modern devices, including smartphones, tablets, and laptops. On the surface, they share a similar DNA: compact plug-in designs, dual USB-C plus one USB-A port, foldable plugs, and support for USB Power Delivery. Both are clearly designed for home, office, and travel use, with solid internal protections and multi-layer safety systems.
Where things start to diverge is in their maximum output power, construction approach, and compatibility depth. The 737 Prime pushes significantly higher wattage and broader peak handling. At the same time, the Prime 67W focuses on refined voltage regulation, wider protocol support such as Quick Charge, and a more travel-oriented physical profile. In short, one leans toward raw output, the other toward balanced efficiency and compact convenience.
High-Wattage Authority: Why the Anker 737 Prime Stands Out
The most defining advantage of the Anker 737 Prime is its 120 Watt maximum output power. That figure alone places it in a different performance tier compared to the 67 Watt ceiling of its sibling. For users powering a laptop alongside a phone and tablet, that extra headroom can make simultaneous charging more practical and less constrained.
It also supports 3-device simultaneous charging with dynamic distribution. Combined with intelligent power allocation and gradual throttling behavior, the charger is engineered to maintain stable delivery even under heavier loads. The 120 Watt peak power handling aligns directly with its advertised maximum charging speed, reinforcing that this unit is built for sustained high-demand scenarios.
From a thermal standpoint, the 737 Prime uses a thermal pad internal cooling design and operates with passive heat dissipation. Its specified thermal throttling threshold of 95 °F provides a measurable indicator of how it manages sustained load conditions. Energy loss as heat is categorized as low, and standby power consumption is rated at 0.23 Watt, which reflects thoughtful idle efficiency.
Physically, it measures 1.69 inches in width, 3.15 inches in depth, and 1.26 inches in height, with a weight of 0.4125 lbs. That places it in the compact category rather than ultra-compact, but the proportions are still travel-friendly. Add in a rated drop resistance of 3 ft and a premium manufacturing quality level, and it presents itself as a performance-first charger that does not sacrifice structural integrity.
In terms of safety, the unit carries FCC certification and features overheat protection, overcurrent protection, overvoltage protection, EMI protection, and ESD protection. The multi-layer safety redundancy and fast protection response time reinforce its suitability for higher-wattage applications where stable regulation matters.
Refined and Travel-Ready: The Case for the Anker Prime 67W
The Anker Prime 67W may not compete on raw wattage, but its 67 Watt maximum output power is still substantial for ultrabooks, tablets, and fast-charging smartphones. What it lacks in peak output, it compensates for with broader compatibility markers and refined electrical performance. Voltage regulation, current regulation, and load regulation are all rated as excellent, suggesting a focus on consistency and precision.
It supports Quick Charge in addition to USB Power Delivery, and it includes a proprietary protocol layer. Cross-brand compatibility is described as universal, which may make it more versatile for mixed ecosystems of Android, Apple, and accessory devices. The charger also holds UL, CE, FCC, and RoHS certifications, reinforcing compliance across the US, EU, and UK regulatory regions.
Physically, this model earns its ultra-compact label with a weight of 0.38 lbs and dimensions of 1.57 inches in width, 3.5 inches in depth, and 1.97 inches in height. While slightly taller, its travel size classification is pocket, which may appeal to users prioritizing a minimal luggage footprint. The housing incorporates plastic, polycarbonate, metal, and aluminum, along with reinforced ports and a V-0 fire-retardant rating.
Thermal management uses a dedicated heat sink within a passive cooling system. Ambient temperature tolerance is rated high, and storage temperature range spans -4-140°F, giving it broader environmental resilience on paper. Anti-spark protection, auto shut-off, and thermal fail-safe mode further extend its layered safety approach.
In everyday convenience terms, both chargers are plug-and-play with foldable plugs and front-facing ports. However, the 67W version includes a user feedback method via LED, sound, and vibration, which introduces a small but notable usability refinement. At $49.99 at Amazon, it is also priced significantly lower than the 737 Prime.
Quick Take
The Anker 737 Prime delivers 120 Watt high-output charging with strong multi-device capability and a performance-oriented design. The Anker Prime 67W counters with excellent regulation, wider certification coverage, and a more compact footprint at a lower price point. Both are capable, but they target slightly different user priorities.
Bottom Line
If you routinely charge a laptop alongside other devices and want maximum wattage headroom, the Anker 737 Prime is the stronger technical performer. If your needs revolve around a single laptop or fast-charging mobile devices in a lighter travel package, the Anker Prime 67W offers balanced performance and broader protocol flexibility at a more accessible cost.
Verdict
Winner: Anker 737 Prime => Superior 120 Watt output and better suited for high-demand, multi-device charging.
Runner-up: Anker Prime 67W => More compact, highly regulated, and competitively priced for everyday fast charging.
Anker 737 Prime is suited for indoor and travel usage environments, while Anker Prime 67W is intended for indoor use only, making the 737 Prime more versatile for travel.
Specifies the environments where the charger is designed to operate.
In the battle of Usage Environment,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
higher
26 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Usage Environment on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Both Anker 737 Prime and Anker Prime 67W are designed for beginner users, indicating similar target user expertise.
Describes the technical experience level required to use the charger effectively.
In the battle of User Level,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
17 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Level on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Charger Type
What type of charger is this?
45
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Wall Charger
37
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Wall Charger
Anker 737 Prime
The device is categorized as a Wall Charger, making it convenient for stationary use.
Defines the primary charger category based on form and usage.
In the battle of Charger Type,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charger Type on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Intended Use
What is the intended use of this charger?
28
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Home, Office, Travel
77
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Home, Office, Travel
Anker Prime 67W
Intended uses include home, office, and travel scenarios, highlighting the charger's versatility across typical user environments.
Describes where and how the charger is primarily intended to be used.
In the battle of Intended Use,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
49 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intended Use on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Device Compatibility
What devices are compatible with this charger?
59
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Accessory
75
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Wearable, Accessory
Anker Prime 67W
Compatible with multiple device categories including smartphone, tablet, laptop, wearable, and accessories, making it versatile for various charging needs.
Indicates the types of devices the charger can power.
In the battle of Device Compatibility,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
16 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Device Compatibility on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Power Source
What is the power source?
65
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
AC Outlet
87
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
AC Outlet
Anker 737 Prime
Power is sourced from an AC Outlet, ideal for regular indoor use.
Defines where the charger draws its power from.
In the battle of Power Source,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
22 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Source on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Installation Type
How is the charger installed?
45
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Plug-In
47
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Plug-In
Anker 737 Prime
This charger utilizes a Plug-In installation type, ensuring straightforward setup.
Describes how the charger is installed or connected.
In the battle of Installation Type,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Installation Type on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Mounting Style
What is the mounting style?
65
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Wall-Mounted
67
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Wall-Mounted
Anker Prime 67W
Designed for wall-mounted installation, saving desk space and improving convenience.
Indicates how the charger is physically positioned during use.
In the battle of Mounting Style,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mounting Style on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Release Year
What year was this charger released?
45
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
2022
81
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
2023
vs
Release Year
Anker 737 Prime was released in 2022, and Anker Prime 67W in 2023; thus, the 67W is the newer model.
The year the charger model was first released to market.
In the battle of Release Year,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
36 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Release Year on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Product Form Factor
What is the product form factor?
45
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Compact
87
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Ultra-Compact
Anker 737 Prime
The product form factor is Compact, which contributes to its portability.
Describes the overall physical form and size profile of the charger.
In the battle of Product Form Factor,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
42 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Product Form Factor on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Product Name
What is the product name?
66
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
66
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Anker Prime Wall Charger
vs
Product Name
The Product Name for Anker 737 Prime is 'Anker 737 Prime' and for Anker Prime 67W it is 'Anker Prime Wall Charger'. This difference clearly identifies each charger.
Official product name used to identify the charger model.
In the battle of Product Name,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 67W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Product Name on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Technology
What charging technology does it use?
85
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
GaN
75
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
GaN, Fast Charging, PPS
vs
Charging Technology
Anker 737 Prime uses GaN charging technology, whereas Anker Prime 67W supports GaN, Fast Charging, and PPS technologies, offering faster and more advanced charging options.
Indicates the core technology used to deliver power efficiently.
In the battle of Charging Technology,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
higher
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Technology on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Compatibility Notes
Are compatibility notes clearly provided?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
No
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Indicates whether additional compatibility limitations or requirements are clearly disclosed.
In the battle of Compatibility Notes,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
higher
37 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Compatibility Notes on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Regulatory Region
Which regulatory regions does it support?
95
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Global
47
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
US, EU, UK
Indicates the regions where the charger meets regulatory standards.
In the battle of Regulatory Region,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
higher
48 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Regulatory Region on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Certifications
What certifications does this charger have?
70
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
FCC
70
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
UL, CE, FCC, RoHS
Lists official safety, quality, and compliance certifications held by the charger.
In the battle of Certifications,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 67W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Certifications on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Anker 737 Prime draws an input current of 1.9 amps, slightly higher than Anker Prime 67W’s 1.8 amps, indicating marginally higher power draw for the 737 Prime.
The amount of current drawn from the power source during operation.
In the battle of Input Current,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
higher
0.1 A
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Current on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Both Anker 737 Prime and Anker Prime 67W include short circuit protection, ensuring device safety.
Automatically shuts down power if a short circuit is detected.
In the battle of Short Circuit Protection,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Short Circuit Protection on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Both Anker 737 Prime and Anker Prime 67W share a Peak Power Handling of 120 watts for the 737 and 67 watts respectively, confirming their max power ratings.
The maximum short-term power the charger can safely handle.
In the battle of Peak Power Handling,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
higher
53.0 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Peak Power Handling on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Load Regulation
How good is the load regulation?
45
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Good
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Excellent
Anker 737 Prime
Using Good load regulation ensures stable performance across different connected devices.
Anker Prime 67W
Load regulation is rated as Excellent, ensuring the voltage output remains stable under varying loads, which is critical for device safety and charging efficiency.
Measures output stability as load increases or decreases.
In the battle of Load Regulation,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
52 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Load Regulation on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Maximum Output Power
What is the maximum output power?
120
Watt
1Votes
67
Watt
0Votes
vs
Maximum Output Power
Anker 737 Prime has a Maximum Output Power of 120 watts, while Anker Prime 67W has 67 watts, providing significantly higher power in the 737 Prime.
The highest total power the charger can deliver to connected devices.
In the battle of Maximum Output Power,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
higher
53.0 Watt
measurement.
Based on community votes for Maximum Output Power,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Anker Prime 67W ◉,
which got 0 votes.
The Anker 737 Prime offers way more max output power than the 67W. This means faster charging for multiple devices.
See more
Input Voltage
What input voltage does it support?
100
Volt
0Votes
100
Volt
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Input voltage is 100 V, suitable for use in regions or devices operating at this voltage.
The voltage range required from the power source to operate safely.
In the battle of Input Voltage,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
equal
100.00 Volt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Voltage on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Input Frequency
What input frequency is supported?
50
Hz
0Votes
50
Hz
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
The input frequency is 50 Hz, a common standard frequency for AC power in many regions around the world.
The electrical frequency range the charger can accept.
In the battle of Input Frequency,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
equal
50.00 Hz
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Frequency on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Output Voltage
What is the output voltage?
5
Volt
0Votes
5
Volt
0Votes
vs
Output Voltage
Both chargers output a voltage of 5 volts, offering consistent output voltage specs.
The voltage supplied to connected devices during charging.
In the battle of Output Voltage,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
equal
5.00 Volt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Voltage on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Output Current
What is the output current?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
3
A
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Output current is 3 A, supporting rapid charging for a variety of devices.
The maximum current delivered to devices for charging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Current on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Power Efficiency
How efficient is the charger?
95
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
High
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
High
Anker 737 Prime
Power efficiency is rated as High, leading to reduced electricity consumption.
Indicates how effectively input power is converted into usable output power.
In the battle of Power Efficiency,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Efficiency on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Standby Power Consumption
How much power is used on standby?
0.23
Watt
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Anker 737 Prime
Standby power consumption is only 0.23 W, which is efficient for energy saving.
Power consumed when the charger is plugged in but not actively charging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Standby Power Consumption on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Voltage Regulation
How good is the voltage regulation?
65
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Good
77
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Excellent
Anker 737 Prime
The voltage regulation is rated as Good, providing stable output power.
Indicates how well output voltage remains stable under varying load conditions.
In the battle of Voltage Regulation,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voltage Regulation on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Surge Protection Rating
How strong is the surge protection?
85
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Enhanced
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Advanced
Anker Prime 67W
Surge protection rating is advanced, offering robust defense against voltage spikes and electrical surges.
Indicates the strength of protection against voltage spikes.
In the battle of Surge Protection Rating,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surge Protection Rating on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Overvoltage Protection
Does it prevent overvoltage?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Anker 737 Prime
This charger is equipped with overvoltage protection, safeguarding devices from potential damage.
Protects devices from excessive voltage output.
In the battle of Overvoltage Protection,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overvoltage Protection on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Minimum Output Power
What is the minimum output power?
22.5
Watt
0Votes
67
Watt
0Votes
The lowest stable power output supported by the charger.
In the battle of Minimum Output Power,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
44.5 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Minimum Output Power on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Power Factor
What is the power factor?
95
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
High
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
High
Indicates how efficiently electrical power is drawn from the power source.
In the battle of Power Factor,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Factor on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Current Regulation
How good is the current regulation?
55
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Good
87
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Excellent
Indicates how consistently current is controlled during charging.
In the battle of Current Regulation,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
32 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Current Regulation on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Ripple & Noise
How much ripple and noise is present?
95
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Low
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Low
Indicates the level of electrical noise present in the output.
In the battle of Ripple & Noise,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ripple & Noise on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Overcurrent Protection
Is overcurrent protection included?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Prevents damage by limiting excessive current flow.
In the battle of Overcurrent Protection,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overcurrent Protection on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Charging consistency is described as consistent for both Anker 737 Prime and Anker Prime 67W, promising stable charging performance.
Indicates how evenly charging speed is maintained throughout a session.
In the battle of Charging Consistency,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Consistency on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Maximum Charging Speed
What is the maximum charging speed?
120
Watt
0Votes
67
Watt
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
The maximum charging speed is rated at 120 W, allowing for rapid charging of devices.
Anker Prime 67W
Maximum charging speed is 67 W, enabling fast charging suitable for a broad range of devices including laptops and smartphones.
The highest charging power delivered to a single device.
In the battle of Maximum Charging Speed,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
higher
53.0 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Maximum Charging Speed on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Throttling Behavior
How does the charger throttle performance?
95
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Gradual
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Gradual
Anker 737 Prime
Throttling behavior is described as Gradual, which helps maintain device performance under load.
Anker Prime 67W
Throttling behavior is gradual, which means charging speed will reduce smoothly as the battery nears full capacity to protect battery health.
Describes how charging speed is reduced when limits are reached.
In the battle of Throttling Behavior,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Throttling Behavior on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Heat Management Efficiency
How efficient is heat management?
95
Anker 737 Prime
1Votes
High
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
High
vs
Heat Management Efficiency
Both chargers have high heat management efficiency, which helps maintain safe operating temperatures.
Measures how effectively heat is managed during charging.
In the battle of Heat Management Efficiency,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Heat Management Efficiency,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Anker Prime 67W ◉,
which got 0 votes.
Heat management is high on both but I prefer the 737 Prime since it explicitly states dynamic power distribution which seems smarter.
See more
Charging Speed
What is the charging speed category?
45
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Fast
87
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Ultra-Fast
Anker Prime 67W
Charging speed is ultra-fast, helping reduce device charging time significantly.
Classifies overall charging speed based on supported power and protocols.
In the battle of Charging Speed,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
42 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Speed on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Power Distribution Method
How is power distributed?
85
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Dynamic
87
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Dynamic
vs
Power Distribution Method
Power distribution for both products is dynamic, optimizing power allocation among connected devices.
Describes how power is allocated across multiple ports.
In the battle of Power Distribution Method,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Distribution Method on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Intelligent Power Allocation
Does it allocate power intelligently?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Anker 737 Prime
The charger features intelligent power allocation, optimizing energy distribution during operation.
Automatically adjusts power delivery based on connected devices.
In the battle of Intelligent Power Allocation,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intelligent Power Allocation on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Device Detection Accuracy
How accurate is device detection?
95
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
High
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
High
Anker 737 Prime
Device detection accuracy is rated High, enhancing compatibility with various electronics.
Accuracy in identifying connected devices and their power needs.
In the battle of Device Detection Accuracy,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Device Detection Accuracy on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Simultaneous Device Charging
How many devices can be charged simultaneously?
25
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
3
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Simultaneous Device Charging
Anker 737 Prime can charge 3 devices simultaneously, but Anker Prime 67W does not specify simultaneous charging, making the 737 Prime more suitable for multiple devices.
The maximum number of devices that can be charged at the same time.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Simultaneous Device Charging on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Stability
How stable is the charging performance?
45
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Stable
47
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Stable
Reflects how consistent charging output remains over time.
In the battle of Charging Stability,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Stability on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Full Charge Time Estimate
How long does a full charge take?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Estimated time required to fully charge a typical device.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Full Charge Time Estimate on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Idle Charging Behavior
What happens after charging is complete?
95
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Standby
87
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Standby
vs
Idle Charging Behavior
Both products enter standby idle charging behavior, showing similar power management when idle.
Describes behavior when a device is fully charged but still connected.
In the battle of Idle Charging Behavior,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Idle Charging Behavior on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Adaptive Charging
Does it support adaptive charging?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Adjusts charging patterns based on device needs and conditions.
In the battle of Adaptive Charging,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adaptive Charging on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Startup Charging Delay
Is there a delay before charging starts?
No
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
No
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Time taken before charging begins after a device is connected.
In the battle of Startup Charging Delay,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 67W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Startup Charging Delay on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Length of the included charging cable.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Length on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Connector Type
What connector types are supported?
75
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
USB‑A, USB‑C
72
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
USB-C, USB-A
Anker Prime 67W
This charger supports both USB-C and USB-A connector types, enabling compatibility with a wide range of devices that use these common standards.
Types of connectors supported by the charger.
In the battle of Connector Type,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connector Type on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Port Durability
How durable are the ports?
95
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
High
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
High
Anker 737 Prime
The port durability is rated as High, suggesting it can withstand frequent usage.
Expected resistance of ports to wear from repeated use.
In the battle of Port Durability,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Durability on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Connector Durability
How durable are the connectors?
85
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
High
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
High
Anker 737 Prime
The High connector durability indicates its ability to withstand wear and tear.
Durability of the connector interface itself.
In the battle of Connector Durability,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connector Durability on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Total Ports
How many total ports does the charger have?
57
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
3
27
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
3
Anker Prime 67W
Equipped with a total of 3 ports, enabling multiple device connection and charging simultaneously.
Total number of output ports available for charging devices.
In the battle of Total Ports,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
higher
30 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Total Ports on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Wireless Charging
Does it support wireless charging?
No
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
No
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Indicates whether the charger supports wireless charging.
In the battle of Wireless Charging,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 67W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Charging on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Wireless Charging Power
What is the wireless charging power?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum power delivered during wireless charging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Charging Power on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Detachable Cable
Is the cable detachable?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Indicates whether the charging cable can be detached.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Detachable Cable on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Interchangeable Plugs
Does it support interchangeable plugs?
No
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
No
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
vs
Interchangeable Plugs
Neither Anker 737 Prime nor Anker Prime 67W offers interchangeable plugs, limiting plug customization.
Supports interchangeable plug heads for different regions.
In the battle of Interchangeable Plugs,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 67W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Interchangeable Plugs on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Pass-Through Charging
Does it support pass-through charging?
No
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
No
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Allows the charger to power devices while itself being powered.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pass-Through Charging on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Port Placement
Where are the ports located?
75
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Front
57
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Front
Location of charging ports on the charger body.
In the battle of Port Placement,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
higher
18 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Placement on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Port Labeling
Are the ports labeled?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Indicates whether ports are clearly labeled for identification.
In the battle of Port Labeling,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Labeling on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Magnetic Alignment
Does it support magnetic alignment?
No
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
No
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Supports magnetic alignment for easier device placement.
In the battle of Magnetic Alignment,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 67W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Magnetic Alignment on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Daisy-Chain
Can it be daisy-chained?
No
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
No
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Allows multiple chargers or devices to be linked together.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Daisy-Chain on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Port Power Priority
How is port power priority handled?
95
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Auto
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Auto
Determines how power priority is assigned among ports.
In the battle of Port Power Priority,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Power Priority on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Anker 737 Prime is classified as compact for travel size, whereas Anker Prime 67W is classified as pocket-sized, making the 67W physically smaller and easier to carry.
Overall size category based on dimensions and portability.
In the battle of Travel Size Classification,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
32 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Travel Size Classification,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Anker Prime 67W ◉,
which got 0 votes.
70
Anker Prime 67W
1Votes
Plastic, Polycarbonate, Metal, Aluminum
vs
Housing Material
Anker 737 Prime uses plastic housing, while Anker Prime 67W combines plastic, polycarbonate, metal, and aluminum, indicating a potentially more premium build for the 67W.
Primary material used for the outer charger casing.
In the battle of Housing Material,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
25 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Housing Material,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Anker Prime 67W ◉,
which got 1 votes.
Heat-resistant materials are not specified for Anker 737 Prime but are confirmed for Anker Prime 67W, suggesting better heat resistance in the 67W.
Uses materials designed to withstand high temperatures safely.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat-Resistant Materials on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Drop Resistance
Anker 737 Prime is drop resistant up to 3 feet, but this is not specified for Anker Prime 67W, so the 737 Prime may offer better drop protection.
Maximum drop height the charger can withstand without damage.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Drop Resistance on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Scratch Resistance
How scratch-resistant is it?
35
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Medium
37
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Medium
vs
Scratch Resistance
Both chargers have medium scratch resistance, providing moderate durability against surface wear.
Resistance of the surface to scratches and abrasions.
In the battle of Scratch Resistance,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Scratch Resistance on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Moisture Resistance
Is it resistant to moisture?
0
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
None
0
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
None
Anker 737 Prime
Moisture resistance is reported as None, which means care should be taken to avoid exposure to water.
Ability to withstand moisture exposure.
In the battle of Moisture Resistance,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 67W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Moisture Resistance on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Material
What material is the plug made of?
40
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Plastic, Metal
72
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Metal
Material used for the plug prongs and structure.
In the battle of Plug Material,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
32 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Plug Material on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Port Reinforcement
Are the ports reinforced?
0
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Standard
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Reinforced
Indicates whether charging ports are reinforced for durability.
In the battle of Port Reinforcement,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
97 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Reinforcement on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Fire-Retardant Rating
What is the fire-retardant rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
87
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
V-0
Fire safety rating of the charger materials.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fire-Retardant Rating on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Surface Finish
What is the surface finish?
75
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Textured
27
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Matte
External surface finish affecting grip and aesthetics.
In the battle of Surface Finish,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
higher
48 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surface Finish on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Build Rigidity
How rigid is the charger build?
95
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Solid
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Solid
Overall structural stiffness of the charger body.
In the battle of Build Rigidity,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Build Rigidity on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Material Sustainability Level
How sustainable are the materials?
45
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Medium
47
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Medium
vs
Material Sustainability Level
Material sustainability levels are medium for both Anker 737 Prime and Anker Prime 67W, reflecting similar environmental considerations in materials.
Use of sustainable or environmentally friendly materials.
In the battle of Material Sustainability Level,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Material Sustainability Level on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal fail-safe mode is not available for Anker 737 Prime, whereas Anker Prime 67W has this feature, reflecting improved thermal protection.
Emergency mode that safely disables charging during extreme heat.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Fail-Safe Mode on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Temperature Monitoring
Is temperature actively monitored?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Anker 737 Prime
Temperature monitoring is an available feature, enhancing performance reliability during usage.
Continuously monitors internal temperature during operation.
In the battle of Temperature Monitoring,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Temperature Monitoring on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Electrical Isolation
Is electrical isolation implemented?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Anker 737 Prime
This model includes electrical isolation, which helps enhance safety.
Separates high-voltage and low-voltage components for safety.
In the battle of Electrical Isolation,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Electrical Isolation on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
ESD Protection
Is ESD protection supported?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Anker 737 Prime
This model offers ESD protection, helping guard against electrostatic discharge.
Shields the charger from electrostatic discharge damage.
In the battle of ESD Protection,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
ESD Protection on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Fault Detection
Can it detect electrical faults?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Anker 737 Prime
This model includes fault detection, which helps prevent potential issues during operation.
Detects abnormal electrical conditions during operation.
In the battle of Fault Detection,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fault Detection on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Safety Redundancy Level
What is the safety redundancy level?
95
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Multi‑Layer
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Multi-Layer
vs
Safety Redundancy Level
Both chargers feature multi-layer safety redundancy, offering enhanced protection during use.
Indicates the number of safety systems working together.
In the battle of Safety Redundancy Level,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Redundancy Level on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Safety Certification Level
What is the safety certification level?
95
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Premium
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Premium
Anker Prime 67W
Safety certification level is premium, ensuring compliance with the highest industry standards for electrical safety.
Overall strength of safety certifications achieved.
In the battle of Safety Certification Level,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Certification Level on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Overheat Protection
Does it have overheat protection?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Automatically reduces or shuts off power when excessive heat is detected.
In the battle of Overheat Protection,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overheat Protection on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Grounding
Does it support grounding?
No
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
No
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Supports grounding to reduce shock and electrical interference.
In the battle of Grounding,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 67W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Grounding on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Child Safety Shutter
Is there a child safety shutter?
No
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
No
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
vs
Child Safety Shutter
Neither Anker 737 Prime nor Anker Prime 67W includes child safety shutters, which may be a consideration for households with children.
Prevents accidental insertion of objects into live ports.
In the battle of Child Safety Shutter,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 67W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Child Safety Shutter on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Anti-Spark Protection
Does it have anti-spark protection?
No
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Reduces sparking when plugging or unplugging devices.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Anti-Spark Protection on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
EMI Protection
Is EMI protection included?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Protects against electromagnetic interference affecting nearby electronics.
In the battle of EMI Protection,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
EMI Protection on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Shut-Off
Does it shut off automatically?
No
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Automatically cuts power when unsafe conditions are detected.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Shut-Off on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Protection Response Time
How fast does protection activate?
54
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Fast
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Protection Response Time
Protection response time is fast in Anker 737 Prime but not specified for Anker Prime 67W, indicating faster protection action in the 737 Prime.
Time taken for protection systems to activate during a fault.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Protection Response Time on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Cross-brand compatibility is limited in Anker 737 Prime but universal in Anker Prime 67W, making the 67W more versatile across devices.
Level of compatibility across different device brands.
In the battle of Cross-Brand Compatibility,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
72 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cross-Brand Compatibility on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Specifies the wireless charging standard supported.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Charging Standard on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Both support tablet charging but I appreciate the 67W's universal cross-brand compatibility more for mixed devices.
See more
USB Power Delivery
Does it support USB Power Delivery?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Indicates support for the USB Power Delivery standard for fast and flexible charging.
In the battle of USB Power Delivery,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB Power Delivery on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Quick Charge
Does it support Quick Charge?
No
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Indicates compatibility with Qualcomm Quick Charge technology.
In the battle of Quick Charge,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Quick Charge on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
PPS
Does it support PPS?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Supports Programmable Power Supply for efficient fast charging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
PPS on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Apple Charging
Is it compatible with Apple devices?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Optimized compatibility with Apple devices and charging requirements.
In the battle of Apple Charging,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Apple Charging on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Android Charging
Is it compatible with Android devices?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Ensures compatibility with Android devices and charging protocols.
In the battle of Android Charging,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Android Charging on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Wearable Charging
Can it charge wearables?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Supports charging of wearables like smartwatches or earbuds.
In the battle of Wearable Charging,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wearable Charging on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Backward Compatibility
Is it backward compatible?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
vs
Backward Compatibility
Both models support backward compatibility, allowing use with older device standards.
Maintains compatibility with older charging standards and devices.
In the battle of Backward Compatibility,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Backward Compatibility on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Proprietary Protocol,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Proprietary Protocol on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Thermal Throttling Threshold
Anker 737 Prime has a specified thermal throttling threshold of 95°F, while Anker Prime 67W has no available data, indicating known temperature performance only for the 737 Prime.
Temperature at which charging power is reduced to prevent overheating.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Throttling Threshold on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal dissipation method is passive for both chargers, using non-active cooling systems to manage heat.
Method used to release heat during operation.
In the battle of Thermal Dissipation Method,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
32 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Dissipation Method on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Loss as Heat
How much energy is lost as heat?
75
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Low
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Low
vs
Energy Loss as Heat
Energy loss as heat is low for both Anker 737 Prime and Anker Prime 67W, improving energy efficiency and safety.
Percentage of input energy lost as heat during charging.
In the battle of Energy Loss as Heat,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
higher
22 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Loss as Heat on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Sustained Load Temperature Stability
How stable is temperature under sustained load?
95
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Stable
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Stable
vs
Sustained Load Temperature Stability
Both chargers maintain stable sustained load temperature stability, which ensures consistent performance under continuous use.
Temperature stability during prolonged high-load charging.
In the battle of Sustained Load Temperature Stability,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sustained Load Temperature Stability on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Operating Temperature Range
What is the operating temperature range?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The temperature range within which the charger operates safely.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Operating Temperature Range on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Storage Temperature Range
What is the storage temperature range?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
77
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
-4–140°F
Temperature range safe for storing the charger when not in use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Storage Temperature Range on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Cooling Design
What internal cooling design is used?
75
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Thermal Pads
67
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Heat Sink
Internal structure designed to manage heat.
In the battle of Internal Cooling Design,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Cooling Design on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Fanless Design
Is the charger fanless?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Indicates whether cooling is achieved without a fan.
In the battle of Fanless Design,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fanless Design on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Noise Level
How noisy is the charger?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Operational noise produced during charging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Noise Level on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Ambient Temperature Tolerance
How tolerant is it to ambient temperatures?
35
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Medium
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
High
Ability to perform in varying ambient temperatures.
In the battle of Ambient Temperature Tolerance,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
62 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ambient Temperature Tolerance on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Altitude Operating Range
What altitude can it operate at?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum altitude at which the charger operates reliably.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Altitude Operating Range on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Both chargers are travel friendly, making them convenient for use on the go.
Designed for easy transport and use while traveling.
In the battle of Travel Friendly,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Travel Friendly on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Orientation
What is the plug orientation?
15
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Straight
27
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Straight
vs
Plug Orientation
Both products feature a straight plug orientation, which is common and easy to use.
Orientation of the plug relative to the charger body.
In the battle of Plug Orientation,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Plug Orientation on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Foldable Plug
Does it have a foldable plug?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Indicates whether the plug can fold for easier storage and travel.
In the battle of Foldable Plug,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Foldable Plug on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Cable Management
How is the cable managed?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
57
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
External
vs
Cable Management
Cable management is unspecified for Anker 737 Prime but external for Anker Prime 67W, indicating better cable handling in the 67W.
How the charging cable is managed when not in use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Management on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Indicator Behavior
How do the indicators behave?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
How indicator lights behave during operation.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Indicator Behavior on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
User Feedback Method
How does it provide user feedback?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
72
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
LED, Sound, Vibration
Methods used to communicate status to the user.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Feedback Method on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
One-Hand Operation
Can it be operated with one hand?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Allows easy plugging and unplugging with one hand.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
One-Hand Operation on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Setup Complexity
How complex is setup?
85
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Plug‑and‑Play
77
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Plug-and-Play
Effort required to start using the charger.
In the battle of Setup Complexity,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Setup Complexity on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Maintenance Requirements
Does it require maintenance?
95
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
None
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
None
Level of maintenance needed to keep the charger functioning well.
In the battle of Maintenance Requirements,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Maintenance Requirements on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Daily Use Convenience
How convenient is it for daily use?
95
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
High
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
High
vs
Daily Use Convenience
Daily use convenience is rated high for both Anker 737 Prime and Anker Prime 67W, reflecting ease of use for everyday charging needs.
Overall convenience during everyday use.
In the battle of Daily Use Convenience,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Daily Use Convenience on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Firmware Upgradable
Can the firmware be updated?
No
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
No
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Indicates whether the charger firmware can be updated.
In the battle of Firmware Upgradable,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 67W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Firmware Upgradable on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Mean time between failures is high for both Anker 737 Prime and Anker Prime 67W, indicating dependable performance over time.
Average reliability level indicating how often failures are expected.
In the battle of Mean Time Between Failures,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mean Time Between Failures on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Manufacturing quality level is premium for both chargers, suggesting high build standards and reliability.
Overall manufacturing quality classification.
In the battle of Manufacturing Quality Level,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Manufacturing Quality Level on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Reliability Certification
Is reliability certified?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
No
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Anker 737 Prime
The charger holds a reliability certification, indicating adherence to safety and performance standards.
Indicates whether reliability has been independently certified.
In the battle of Reliability Certification,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
higher
37 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Reliability Certification on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Insertion Cycles
How durable is the plug connection over time?
95
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
High
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
High
Indicates how many plug-in and unplug cycles the charger connector is designed to withstand before wear affects performance.
In the battle of Plug Insertion Cycles,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Plug Insertion Cycles on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Port Wear Resistance
How resistant are the ports to wear?
45
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Medium
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
High
Resistance of charging ports to wear over time.
In the battle of Port Wear Resistance,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
52 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Wear Resistance on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Cable Flex Cycles
How durable is the charging cable under repeated bending?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Indicates how many bending cycles the charging cable can withstand before performance degradation.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Flex Cycles on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Long-Term Stability
How stable is long-term performance?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Stable
Performance consistency over extended use periods.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Long-Term Stability on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Environmental Stress Resistance
How resistant is it to environmental stress?
45
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Medium
47
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Medium
vs
Environmental Stress Resistance
Environmental stress resistance is medium for both chargers, indicating moderate resilience in various conditions.
Ability to withstand heat, humidity, and other stresses.
In the battle of Environmental Stress Resistance,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Environmental Stress Resistance on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Carbon footprint category is medium for both Anker 737 Prime and Anker Prime 67W, reflecting moderate environmental impact.
Estimated environmental impact from production and use.
In the battle of Carbon Footprint Category,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Carbon Footprint Category on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Energy saving features are not specified for Anker 737 Prime but present for Anker Prime 67W, which may help reduce power consumption on the 67W.
Built-in features designed to reduce energy consumption.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Saving Features on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Efficiency Rating
What is the energy efficiency rating?
95
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
High
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
High
vs
Energy Efficiency Rating
Energy efficiency rating is high for both Anker 737 Prime and Anker Prime 67W, supporting energy-conscious charging.
Overall classification of how efficiently the charger converts power.
In the battle of Energy Efficiency Rating,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Efficiency Rating on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Star Compliance
Is it Energy Star compliant?
No
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
No
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Indicates compliance with Energy Star efficiency standards.
In the battle of Energy Star Compliance,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 67W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Star Compliance on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Standby Efficiency
How efficient is the charger in standby mode?
95
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
High
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
High
Indicates how efficiently the charger uses power while plugged in but not actively charging.
In the battle of Standby Efficiency,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Standby Efficiency on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Green Materials Usage
Are green materials used?
No
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
No
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Uses environmentally friendly or recycled materials.
In the battle of Green Materials Usage,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 67W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Green Materials Usage on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
60
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Email, Chat, Online Portal
vs
Support Channels
Anker 737 Prime supports customer help via an online portal, while Anker Prime 67W offers support through email, chat, and online portal, giving the 67W broader support options.
Ways users can contact customer support.
In the battle of Support Channels,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Support Channels on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Replacement policy is standard returns for both chargers, ensuring straightforward replacement procedures.
Defines the terms under which a defective or faulty charger can be replaced.
In the battle of Replacement Policy,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
higher
48 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Replacement Policy on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Warranty Length
How long is the warranty?
45
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
2 Years
27
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
2 Years
vs
Warranty Length
Warranty length is 2 years for both Anker 737 Prime and Anker Prime 67W, providing equal coverage duration.
Duration of warranty coverage provided with the charger.
In the battle of Warranty Length,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
higher
18 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Warranty Length on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Customer Support Availability
When is customer support available?
35
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Business Hours
17
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Business Hours
vs
Customer Support Availability
Customer support availability is limited to business hours for both Anker 737 Prime and Anker Prime 67W, so support accessibility times are the same.
Availability of customer support services.
In the battle of Customer Support Availability,
Anker 737 Prime ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
higher
18 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Customer Support Availability on Anker 737 Prime ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Surveys
Because hot takes deserve votes.
Charging Speed
How satisfied are you with the charging speed of this chargers when powering everyday devices?
Extremely fast charging — Under 1 hour
0Votes
0Votes
Very fast charging — 1 to 2 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Decent charging speed — 2 to 4 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Slow charging — 4 to 6 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very slow charging — Over 6 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Power Output Performance
How well does this chargers provide enough power for phones, tablets, or laptops?
Handles high-demand devices easily — 65 watts or more
0Votes
0Votes
Strong and reliable output — 45 to 64 watts
0Votes
0Votes
Good for most daily devices — 25 to 44 watts
0Votes
0Votes
Limited power capability — 10 to 24 watts
0Votes
0Votes
Very weak power delivery — Under 10 watts
0Votes
0Votes
Durability and Build Quality
How durable does this chargers feel during long-term daily use?
Feels built to last a long time — Over 5 years
0Votes
0Votes
Very solid and dependable — 3 to 5 years
0Votes
0Votes
Decently built for regular use — 2 to 3 years
0Votes
0Votes
Feels somewhat fragile — 1 to 2 years
0Votes
0Votes
Breaks down too quickly — Under 1 year
0Votes
0Votes
Portability and Size
How easy is it to carry this chargers for travel or commuting?
Ultra compact and pocketable — Under 3 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Light and travel friendly — 3 to 5 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Moderately easy to carry — 5 to 7 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Somewhat bulky — 7 to 10 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Heavy and inconvenient — Over 10 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Heat Management
How well does this chargers control heat during extended charging sessions?
Stays cool even under heavy use — Under 90 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Gets slightly warm — 90 to 100 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Noticeably warm to the touch — 100 to 110 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Runs quite hot — 110 to 120 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Uncomfortably hot — Over 120 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Ease of Use
How easy is it to use this chargers on a daily basis?
Effortless and intuitive — No learning needed
0Votes
0Votes
Very easy to understand — Minimal effort
0Votes
0Votes
Takes a little getting used to — Some adjustment
0Votes
0Votes
Slightly confusing at times — Requires patience
0Votes
0Votes
Frustrating to use — Feels complicated
0Votes
0Votes
Setup Experience
How smooth is the initial setup experience with this chargers?
Instantly ready to use — Plug and charge
0Votes
0Votes
Quick and simple setup — Less than 1 minute
0Votes
0Votes
Setup takes some attention — A few minutes
0Votes
0Votes
Setup feels awkward — Several minutes
0Votes
0Votes
Setup feels annoying — Too many steps
0Votes
0Votes
Design and Visual Appeal
How attractive does the design of this chargers look in everyday environments?
Sleek and modern look — Feels premium
0Votes
0Votes
Clean and stylish design — Looks nice
0Votes
0Votes
Simple and acceptable — Nothing special
0Votes
0Votes
Somewhat unattractive — Feels dated
0Votes
0Votes
Cheap-looking design — Not appealing
0Votes
0Votes
Noise and Comfort
How comfortable is this chargers to use in quiet environments?
Completely silent operation — No noise at all
0Votes
0Votes
Almost silent — Barely noticeable
0Votes
0Votes
Occasionally noticeable — Slight sound
0Votes
0Votes
Clearly noticeable noise — Can be distracting
0Votes
0Votes
Annoyingly loud — Very disruptive
0Votes
0Votes
Pricing and Value
How do you feel about the price of this chargers compared to what it offers?
Supermod
Moderator
Recaptor
0
Cartling
